A messaging system, by necessity, uses transactional behavior internally. It may be useful for an external client to be able to control the scope of the transactions that impact its behavior.
How can a client control its transactions with the messaging system?
Use a Transactional Client—make the client’s session with the messaging system transactional so that the client can specify transaction boundaries.
Both a sender and a receiver can be transactional. With a sender, the message isn’t “really” added to the channel until the sender commits the transaction. With a receiver, the message isn’t “really” removed from the channel until the receiver commits the transaction. A sender that uses explicit transactions can be used with a receiver that uses implicit transactions, and vise versa. A single channel might have a combination of implicitly and explicitly transactional senders; it could also have a combination of receivers....
Related patterns: Channel Adapter, Competing Consumers, Document Message, Event-Driven Consumer, Event Message, Guaranteed Delivery, Message, Message Channel, Message Dispatcher, Message Endpoint, Message Router, Message Sequence, Message Translator, Messaging Bridge, Pipes and Filters, Point-to-Point Channel, Polling Consumer, Publish-Subscribe Channel, Request-Reply, Resequencer
Find the full description of this pattern in:|
Enterprise Integration Patterns
Gregor Hohpe and Bobby Woolf
Parts of this page are available under
the Creative Commons Attribution license.
You can reuse the pattern icon, the pattern name, the problem and solution statements (in bold), and the sketch
under this license. Other portions of the text, such as text chapters or the full pattern text, are protected